Archive for the ‘children’s health’ Category

Treating Kids Pays

Monday, May 21st, 2012

Last week the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) made headlines with the announcement of a proposed rule that would increase payment rates for primary care physicians serving Medicaid patients. The rule would bring Medicaid primary care service fees in line with those paid by Medicare for the duration of 2013 and 2014. According to a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) release, states would receive more than $11 billion to facilitate this boost in payments.

Expanding access to primary care doctors is at the very foundation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the proposed rule reflects the ACA’s requirement that Medicaid payments for primary care services provided by primary care doctors, including pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, be raised to the level of Medicare payment rates for 2013 and 2014. Federal funding will cover 100 percent of the increased payments, with no matching funds required of the states. In addition the payments will be based on the difference between the Medicaid rates used by states in 2009 and current Medicare rates. That means that states that have increased their Medicaid rates since 2009 will realize significant savings, although those that have decreased them will need to return to 2009 levels to benefit.

Last week’s announcement holds important implications for children’s health. Medicaid is the largest source of health care for children, covering roughly 1 in 3 kids according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation. The proposed rule would qualify physicians with a specialty designation of pediatric medicine as primary care providers for purposes of increased payment. In addition, the rule mandates that services provided by pediatric subspecialists also qualify for increased payments. This is very welcome news for children and families, as the American Board of Medical Specialties lists some 20 subspecialties within Pediatrics, such as neonatal-perinatal medicine, pediatric cardiology and pediatric emergency medicine. Requiring that primary care providers are more adequately compensated will ensure that the 30 million children enrolled in Medicaid have access to these essential services.

Preventive care provided by primary care practitioners offers the best hope of improving health outcomes and curbing national health spending. Yet, despite their importance, these doctors are paid far less than specialists and may soon be in short supply due to the aging of the US population, the retirement of physicians and the 30 million additional Americans expected to gain insurance through the ACA. The proposed rule is an important tool states can use to encourage primary care networks to continue to provide checkups, screenings, vaccines and other care to Medicaid beneficiaries and to prepare to expand these efforts to the expected 17 million additional Medicaid enrollees after 2014.

The proposed rule is another benefit from the ACA that supports the primary care workforce and helps ensure every American has high quality, affordable care, including preventive services. Though the boost in reimbursement will only last two years, it represents an investment in Medicaid’s relationship with providers at a time when that relationship is more important than ever.

This rule reminds us of how important the ACA is for children. What this regulation means for families is that more children will have access to doctors, and that’s a good thing.

Nicole Tambouret, Project Director and
Jake Mogan, Intern, New England Alliance for Children’s Health

 

Children’s Mental Health Awareness Week

Friday, May 11th, 2012

The National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health has designated May 6th-12th as national Children’s Mental Health Awareness week. The goal of this week is to help raise awareness of the special concerns of children with mental health needs and to encourage engagement of young people and their families in mental health treatment and policy. In support of this goal states across the country are hosting events and promoting mental health and wellness in children. In Massachusetts, free weekly workshops are being held this month on a variety of children’s mental health topics, and a broadcast celebrating the week aired on local news networks. Down in Tennessee, the Whole Kid Festival in Nashville brought together families, agencies serving families, and vendors to provide information, entertainment and activities for the whole family promoting mental wellness and health in children. Other states around the country have coordinated awareness events and campaigns promoting children’s mental health occurring throughout the week.

Despite increasing awareness of mental health issues in children, one population that continues to be disproportionately affected is children in the foster care system. Studies suggest that between 50 to 60 percent of children in foster care have moderate to severe mental health problems. Additionally, foster youth who have aged out of the system have been found to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder at a rate twice that of U.S. war veterans. To have such a significant percentage of this population suffering from mental health conditions means that there is a clear need for effective, accessible mental health care services for youth in the foster care system and those who exit the system.

Provisions in the Affordable Care Act aim to continue foster youth’s access to health services, including mental health services, beyond their exit from the foster care system. The Affordable Care Act expands Medicaid coverage to former foster youth up to age 26, thus providing continuity of care and access to health care services. This expansion will enable youth exiting the foster care system to continue to receive critical health care services to promote positive physical and mental health and wellbeing.

As health and child wellness advocates work with states to prepare for this expanded coverage, it’s important to have events like Children’s Mental Health Awareness week to remind policy makers and the public about how important these services are to children.

– Nicole Tambouret, Project Director and
Kyle Bogaert, Intern, New England Alliance for Children’s Health

Looking at the Whole Problem, Not Just the Mouth – The Need to Systematically Improve America’s Oral Health

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

Often overlooked, untreated tooth decay and poor oral health have become an epidemic in the United States. In fact, tooth decay is the most common childhood disease, five times more common than asthma.

On March 6th, The New York Times reported that an alarming number of preschoolers were facing oral surgery due to untreated tooth decay. According to the CDC, for the first time in forty years there is an increase in the number of preschoolers with cavities.

While last month’s New York Times story captured the need for more awareness about the importance of oral health to overall health and the need for better diets to prevent tooth decay, it did not explore the fact that there are more than 83 million people who do not receive regular dental care because the existing system is not capable of serving them. An entire quarter of the population, these 83 million people do not receive dental care because they live in communities where there are not enough dentists to meet the need or because the dental care offered is unaffordable.

Without a delivery system in place that provides routine care and preventive services, the proportion of the population that this epidemic effects will persist and grow larger.

Through further examination of the dental delivery system, it is clear America’s oral health is suffering as a result of the systemic problem caused by too few dentists in underserved rural and urban communities. Nearly 50 million Americans live in communities without enough dentists to meet their needs. Compounding the dental shortage problem is that not enough providers accept Medicaid. In 2009, 56 percent of Medicaid-enrolled children did not receive dental care—not even a routine exam.

Last year a study in the American Journal of Pediatrics showed that Medicaid patients were 18 times more likely to be denied care than children with private insurance.

With no place to turn for affordable dental care in their community, patients turn to the emergency room at a high cost to the patients, the health care system and to taxpayers. Last year, the Washington Hospital Association reported that dental visits were the number one reason uninsured patients visited the emergency room and it was the sixth reason for Medicaid enrollees to visit the emergency room.

According to a report released last month by the Pew Center on the States nationally, more than 830,000 visits to emergency rooms nationwide in 2009 were for preventable dental problems, highlighting the substantial cost of ER care. For example, Florida saw dental-related, emergency hospital visits produced charges exceed$88 million in 2010.

Recognizing the need for a better way to address America’s unmet oral health needs, Dr. Louis Sullivan, former Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, offers a systematic approach on how to better deliver care in underserved communities in Monday’s New York Times.

Dr. Sullivan notes that, “A more immediate solution is to train dental therapists who can provide preventive care and routine procedures … outside the confines of a traditional dentist’s office. [They] are common worldwide, and yet in the United States they practice only in Alaska and Minnesota, where state law allows it. Legislation is pending in five more states.

The dental profession has resisted efforts to allow midlevel providers to deliver this kind of care, and the government has so far failed to push for the change. It must do so now. [They] could encourage states to pass laws allowing these providers to practice by calling for demonstration projects proving their worth.”

Dr. Sullivan is not alone in recognizing the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing our oral health needs. Recently Senator Bernard Sanders (I-Vermont) released a report, “Dental Crisis in America: The Need to Expand Access,” that details the problems Americans face in accessing care and potential solutions, including mid-level providers such as dental therapists.

Additionally, Dr. David Nash of the University Of Kentucky College Of Dentistry released a monograph on Tuesday detailing the history of dental therapy both internationally and in the United States. After rigorously reviewing more than 1,100 documents on the care provided by dental therapists worldwide, the authors concluded that these practitioners deliver safe, effective dental care in addition to improving access to care. Included as part of the oral health workforce, they have the potential to decrease the cost of care as well.

With more attention on the dental crisis and solutions, like adding a mid-level provider to improve access to care, we need to keep the momentum up by supporting efforts at the state and federal levels to improve access to care and how care is delivered.

 – David Jordan,  Dental Access Project Director

Don’t Forget What the Affordable Care Act is Doing for Former Foster Youth

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

Much has been made (rightly!) of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions that have transformed health care for young Americans such as the provision that allows most young adults under 26 to remain on their parents’ health plans. As noted in a previous blog in this space, an additional 2.5 million young adults have gained coverage whether or not they are financially dependent upon their parents, living at home, employed, offered insurance through their employer (as of 2014) or attending college. With the anniversary of the enactment of the ACA coming up in just two short days, it’s worth recalling this impressive gain for young adults as they transition from childhood into adulthood.

Just like other young adults, foster care alumni often find it difficult to find affordable health insurance at the age of 18 or 21. However, unlike other young adults, foster care alumni have less access to employer-sponsored health insurance and lack parents that can provide access to such a plan. One of the lesser known provisions of the ACA ensures that, starting in 2014, Medicaid coverage will be available to young adults up to age 26 who were formerly in the foster care system. This expansion represents the most comprehensive and profound legislation for this high-risk population in decades. For youth who age out of care at 18, this means finding their way as adults with affordable, comprehensive health insurance for another eight years. For those in areas where they have the option to stay in care until age 21, this means much the same thing for another five years.

And as with many ACA provisions, getting implementation right with this part of the law will be crucial to ensuring that its promise becomes a reality for children on the verge of adulthood. To this point, one of the key policy questions to consider is: how will youth that are no longer in the foster care system but eligible to continue their Medicaid coverage on January 1, 2014 be identified and maintain their access to Medicaid?

A paper published last year (that was also discussed in this space previously) in the Michigan Journal of Social Work and Social Welfare provides reason for hope that this question can be answered well by documenting the tremendous progress that has been made over the years to improve access to health insurance for foster youth. Legislators and policymakers have not ignored the plight of older foster youth. To the contrary, targeted legislation has received wide-spread, bipartisan support throughout 25 years of changing political administrations. Even in the difficult political atmosphere that accompanied the passing of the ACA, provisions for foster youth were left intact.

When working toward implementation of the ACA for foster youth, the principle that should guide implementation decisions is that this population deserves to access health insurance in the same way their peers have access: whether or not they are financially independent, living at home, employed, offered insurance through their employer or attending college. Let’s ensure foster youth are treated the same as 2.5 million of our children are now treated, with uncomplicated access to care until the age of 26.

Both the ability of young adults to remain on their parents’ health plans and the Medicaid expansion for former foster youth demonstrates the ACA’s commitment to ensuring that children remain healthy as they become adults. We’ve made extraordinary initial progress to date and now we need to keep moving forward and work tirelessly to ensure that all children—especially those most at risk—are able to continue to benefit from all the ACA has to offer.

—Aisha Amanda Marie Hunter, Program Assistant, Policy Reform & Advocacy,
The Annie E. Casey Foundation

& Nicole Tambouret, Project Director,
New England Alliance for Children’s Health

Cross Post: Is Your State Reviewing Potential EHB Benchmarks?

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

This blog was originally posted on “Say Ahhh!” the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families blog.

HHS’s essential health benefits bulletin is less than two months old—in fact, the comment period just closed this week, click here for our comment letter—but some states are already planning for what it could mean for their residents.

The Bulletin indicates that states will be able to choose the core of their essential health benefits package by copying the benefits from one of ten existing health plans. That immediately raises the question—what do those ten plans cover? And which one would be best for kids, families, and all health insurance consumers?

Answering these questions will be complex, but a great way to start is to look at the ten plan choices side-by-side to compare what they cover. In Maine, the Department of Insurance has put together a helpful table that compares coverage across plans in some key benefit categories. It’s by no means a complete analysis, but it’s a great way to begin this important comparison.

Have you seen a similar document in your state? If not, it could be something to ask your state’s insurance regulator to put together. Of course, you’ll still want to make sure that the full plan documents that provide detailed coverage information are released publicly for each of the potential benchmarks before your state’s selection is made. But getting the plan comparison underway with a summary table like Maine’s can be a good way to get started—the Bulletin says states should choose their benchmark plans by the third quarter of this year.

– Joe Touschner
Georgetown University Center for Children and Families 

Recent Developments in Nutrition Policy Affecting Child Health: A Roundup

Friday, January 27th, 2012

The end of 2011 and beginning of 2012 saw significant developments—mostly positive but some negative—in nutrition policy affecting children’s health. From new school meal requirements to food marketing guidelines to evidence supporting the effectiveness of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes, the landscape of nutrition policy affecting children’s health has been changing in important ways.

School Nutrition Standards: Would You Like (Sweet Potato) Fries with That?

First Lady Michelle Obama and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack unveiled the new standards for school meals on January 25 in the form of a final rule, marking the first substantial changes to school meals in 15 years. The standards, a product of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, have drawn significant public attention. People have strong feelings about school meals, as evidenced by the nearly 132,000 public comments the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) received on the issue.

On the whole, the new standards promise to significantly improve the nutritional value of meals served in schools. Some positive developments in the final rule include:

  • • An increase in the amounts of fruits and vegetables served every day
  • • An increase in the amount of whole grains served
  • • A requirement to provide only no- and low-fat milk options
  • • A requirement to reduce the amounts of sodium, trans fat and saturated fat
  • • A requirement to focus portion sizes to reflect appropriate calorie amounts for children based on age

Despite these positive improvements, some important provisions were removed from the initial proposed rule (after Congress required this), which is disappointing. These include limiting the USDA’s ability to regulate the amount of starchy vegetables provided in school lunches as well as preventing the USDA from increasing the amount of tomato paste required in order to allow it to count as a vegetable serving within the new framework.

These changes will have a significant impact, as nearly 32 million children participate in school meal programs every day. The new standards will be phased in over a three-year period, starting in the 2012 to 2013 school year. To see what a sample elementary school lunch menu could look like both before and after the new standards take effect, click here.

Voluntary Food Marketing Principles: Further Setbacks or Ronald McDonald is Here to Stay

On a less positive note, important progress toward the development of voluntary principles for marketing food to children came to a standstill at the end of 2011. The voluntary guidelines, developed by an Interagency Working Group (or IWG, consisting of the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and USDA) have received enormous criticism from the food and beverage industry. Initial opposition to the voluntary guidelines in October resulted in a narrowing focus to reduce advertising targeted at children under the age of 12 rather than all children under the age of 17 and provided exemptions for holiday promotions and established marketing characters. Further setbacks occurred in December when Congress required the IWG to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed guidelines, significantly delaying finalization of the proposal. At this stage, the ultimate fate of the guidelines remains unclear at best.

New Article Adds Further Evidence to Support Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

A new article published in Health Affairs adds to the overwhelming evidence that supports the idea of SSB excise taxes as a key public health measure aimed at addressing obesity. The study authors found that a penny-per-ounce excise tax on SSBs would reduce SSB consumption by 15 percent for adults ages 25 to 64 and a 1.5 percent reduction in obese adults as a result. From 2010 to 2020, the study projected that this decrease in consumption would prevent 26,000 premature deaths while avoiding over $17 billion in medical expenses. While this study focused on adults, it’s consistent with a previous report by the USDA that has demonstrated the similarly positive health benefits for both children and adults resulting from SSB excise taxes.

It’s exciting that addressing child health through nutrition policy is being seen as a major priority. Now, it’s up to child health advocates to continue to educate policymakers about the importance of this issue to keep it front and center amidst a range of competing priorities in the coming months.

—Patrick M. Tigue, Senior Policy Analyst and
Kyle Bogaert, Intern, New England Alliance for Children’s Health

 

Oh so close…

Thursday, January 5th, 2012

While the New England states are leaders in the nation in reducing the number of uninsured children, with coverage rates from 94 to 98 percent across the region, there is one area where New England is falling woefully behind. According to a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities only half the New England states, Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, offer online applications and renewals for families trying to enroll their children in Medicaid or CHIP. This places the region squarely behind other parts of the country including the South and Northwest. With online applications available for everything from credit cards to colleges, it seems hard to believe that applications for vital health services are not available on such an efficient and accessible platform.

Many families live in rural areas without easy access to local government offices. These families would benefit from the remote access offered by online applications. Making applications available online would also reduce the potential for incomplete and misplaced submissions. Through questions, prompts and blocks that do not allow incomplete forms to be submitted, online applications provide useful feedback in a way paper applications cannot.

Given the high tech business sector in many New England states and with all the efforts states have put into achieving such high enrollment numbers, it is surprising that they have not taken advantage of this common-sense extra push. Online applications, along with other streamlined application and renewal procedures may be just what New England needs to get to 100 percent enrollment of eligible children in health coverage. Hopefully New England will make 2012 a year of great advances in coverage and consumer access starting with online applications and renewal for health benefits.

– Nicole Tambouret, Project Director
New England Alliance for Children’ Health

Please note, this blog was updated to reflect Maine’s policy on electronic applications, which was not originally reflected in the report.

The Affordable Care Act is Keeping Young Adults Healthy for the Holidays

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

Thanks to a key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), 2.5 million young adults will be healthy for the holidays this year. As we’ve blogged about previously, the ACA allows most young adults under 26 to remain on their parents’ health plans if they don’t yet have access to coverage through their job. Prior to the ACA, insurers had the option of removing enrolled children usually when they turned 19 or perhaps a few years later if they were full-time students. By allowing young adults to continue to receive coverage through a parent’s plan, the ACA gives young adults and their families peace of mind that the transition to adulthood doesn’t have to mean forgoing access to essential health care.

The new figures released by National Center for Health Statistics confirm that since the provision went into effect in September 2010, an additional 2.5 million young adults gained coverage even as other age brackets remained steady in coverage levels. This means that from September 2010 to June 2011 the percentage of adults 19 to 25 with coverage increased from 64 percent to 73 percent and it’s clear that the higher levels of coverage are because of the changes brought about by the ACA.

We can’t think of a better way to start the New Year than healthy and worry free and the ACA has already made that a reality for 2.5 million young adults. This is truly something to celebrate during this festive time of year.

—Nicole Tambouret, Project Director
and Patrick M. Tigue, Senior Policy Analyst

Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program Buffer the Impact of the Recession on Children

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

In most respects, children have not been exempt from the impacts of the current economic downturn. The number of children living in poverty in the United States rose to 15.7 million in 2010—a 19 percent increase from 2008. Despite this bleak picture, a new report shows that the rate of uninsured children actually dropped by 14 percent during this same time. What accounts for these counterintuitive findings?

The new report from our partners at the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute’s Center for Children and Families (CCF) (click here for the executive summary) provides strong evidence that the uninsured rate for children decreased in the midst of the worst recession in decades because Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) were in place to prevent children from failing through the cracks.

CCF found that private insurance coverage of children eroded during this period—dropping by 4.5 percent. This is no surprise, since the recession cost millions of families their jobs and their employer-sponsored insurance (ESI). But public insurance coverage of children increased by 5.8 percent during this same time, filling the gap left by declining ESI. This is simple, hard evidence that public coverage programs are irreplaceable sources of coverage that protect children’s access to care when the economy falters.

Ironically—maybe only in the Alanis Morissette meaning of the word—it’s during these hard economic times, when Medicaid and CHIP are most needed as a safety net, that their funding is most at risk. As policy makers scramble to fill state budget gaps, they too often turn to harmful Medicaid and CHIP cuts such as reductions in provider payments, restrictions on covered services, and increased premiums and co-payments. The findings in the report emphasize why it’s essential that policy makers turn instead to the dozens of delivery and payment system reform options that can achieve savings in Medicaid and CHIP without undermining—and often by actually strengthening—these programs. (See our Medicaid Report Card for ideas on how your state can save money in Medicaid.)

The report also highlights the importance of the maintenance of effort requirement in the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits state policymakers from cutting eligibility for children on Medicaid and CHIP until 2019. The heartening findings in the CCF report would simply not have been possible had states been permitted to slash eligibility in these programs.

The full report includes state-specific data on children’s insurance rates, so check it out and see how your state did (only one state, Minnesota, had a statistically significant increase in uninsured children). With our economic woes likely to continue for some time, this report should renew our commitment to protecting Medicaid and CHIP. The health of our children depends on it.

—Katherine Howitt, Senior Policy Analyst
and Patrick M. Tigue, Senior Policy Analyst

New Steps in the Fight Against Childhood Obesity

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

In the United States, childhood obesity is an epidemic. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that 17 percent of children between ages 2 to 19 are obese. CDC data also show that since 1980 the prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents has nearly tripled. Childhood obesity is linked to a number of debilitating and expensive diseases including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, several kinds of cancer, and other chronic conditions. Clearly, childhood obesity is one of the most pressing health issues facing children across the nation.

And that’s why here at the New England Alliance for Children’s Health, a program of Community Catalyst, we were excited to see that the CDC recently announced a new initiative aimed at addressing childhood obesity. The Childhood Obesity Demonstration Project was created by the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) and funded through the Affordable Care Act (ACA). It will provide $25 million over a four year period to comprehensively identify effective health care and community approaches to reduce childhood obesity in the areas of supporting healthy dietary choices and promoting active living. Children aged two to twelve who are enrolled in CHIP are the target population for the project.

CDC chose only four grantees to participate in the project. Three grantees will serve as research facilities (the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, San Diego State University, and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health) that will identify strategies that are effective means to reduce childhood obesity and one grantee (the University of Houston) will serve as the evaluation center for the project and share lessons learned across identified strategies. The project will conclude in September 2015 at which time CDC will widely share the findings from the initiative and make recommendations about effective strategies to prevent childhood obesity among undeserved children.

What we learn from this project needs to inform policy choices at the federal, state and local level if we are going to make much needed progress on the childhood obesity epidemic. And thanks to CHIPRA and the ACA, we now have an even better chance of doing so.

—Patrick M. Tigue, Senior Policy Analyst